Russell's teapot… Faulty logic as there is no proof of this teapot while there is ample evidence on numerous fields such as: history, archeology, science (suppressed, overlooked and/or ignored), medicine, prophetic math, and paranormal activity of vast degree which indicates that there is "something" more than just nothing out there… Maybe the flying spaghetti monster is in the teapot and will evolve into something in a few billion or so years… extreme Liberal logic… lol
Honourable Bertrand Russell's teapot analogy did not satisfy even atheistic philosophers. Believing in a floating teapot is not the same as believing in theology. Teapots are not gods. Trivialities, knowable physical objects, the burden of proof-- things to discuss/contemplate over tea. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot
Linda Gunn-Russell. One *needs* a teapot in the bedroom for romantic entertaining, or for serving friends who prefer to hang out in your bedroom. Thus, the 2nd fabulous teapot I've suggested for this room!
scientificphilosopher: “Russell’s Teapot: “I ought to call myself an agnostic; but, for all practical purposes, I am an atheist. I do not think the existence of the Christian God any more probable than the existence of the Gods of Olympus or...