Does Believing in Inerrancy Require One to Believe in Young Earth Creationism? Norm Geisler 'Hell no -- quit turning this into a dogma!' If you're a young-earth creationist please read this: http://www.christianpost.com/news/does-believing-in-inerrancy-require-one-to-believe-in-young-earth-creationism-114464/
Wikipedia.org/***~~~***!!! Old Earth-- creationism is an umbrella term for a number of types of creationism, including gap creationism, progressive creationism, and evolutionary creationism. Old Earth creationism is typically more compatible with mainstream scientific thought on the issues of physics, chemistry, geology and the age of the Earth, in comparison to young Earth creationism.
Lets not forget: young earth, creationism, and that crap about dinosaurs and people coexisting. Why not just let em write their own science curriculum? Oh, wait. We do. We don't wanna offend their "special" beliefs.
What is anti-religion is promoting a demonstrably false gospel that elevates fabrications and rejects reality. The Earth is not 6,000 or 10,000 years old. The claim that it is cannot be defended. At all. It’s not just a scientifically indefensible claim, it’s a morally indefensible claim. Young-earth creationism is simply immoral. Not all sins are stupid and not all stupidity is sinful, but young-earth creationism is both.