Does Believing in Inerrancy Require One to Believe in Young Earth Creationism?   Norm Geisler 'Hell no -- quit turning this into a dogma!' If you're a young-earth creationist please read this:  http://www.christianpost.com/news/does-believing-in-inerrancy-require-one-to-believe-in-young-earth-creationism-114464/

Does Believing in Inerrancy Require One to Believe in Young Earth Creationism? Norm Geisler 'Hell no -- quit turning this into a dogma!' If you're a young-earth creationist please read this: http://www.christianpost.com/news/does-believing-in-inerrancy-require-one-to-believe-in-young-earth-creationism-114464/

Wikipedia.org/***~~~***!!! Old Earth-- creationism is an umbrella term for a number of types of creationism, including gap creationism, progressive creationism, and evolutionary creationism.[1] Old Earth creationism is typically more compatible with mainstream scientific thought on the issues of physics, chemistry, geology and the age of the Earth, in comparison to young Earth creationism.

Wikipedia.org/***~~~***!!! Old Earth-- creationism is an umbrella term for a number of types of creationism, including gap creationism, progressive creationism, and evolutionary creationism.[1] Old Earth creationism is typically more compatible with mainstream scientific thought on the issues of physics, chemistry, geology and the age of the Earth, in comparison to young Earth creationism.

pin 1
Lets not forget: young earth, creationism,  and that crap about dinosaurs and people coexisting. Why not just let em write their own science curriculum? Oh, wait. We do. We don't wanna offend their "special" beliefs.

Lets not forget: young earth, creationism, and that crap about dinosaurs and people coexisting. Why not just let em write their own science curriculum? Oh, wait. We do. We don't wanna offend their "special" beliefs.

pin 102
heart 33
speech 38
Intelligent Design, Creationism, it's radical stepchild, Young Earth Creationism; none of these are sciences. Stop. #science

Intelligent Design, Creationism, it's radical stepchild, Young Earth Creationism; none of these are sciences. Stop. #science

pin 11
heart 4
On the Origin of Human Mitochondrial DNA Differences, New Generation Time Data Both Suggest a Unified Young-Earth Creation Model and Challenge the Evolutionary Out-of-Africa Model

On the Origin of Human Mitochondrial DNA Differences, New Generation Time Data Both Suggest a Unified Young-Earth Creation Model and Challenge the Evolutionary Out-of-Africa Model

What is anti-religion is promoting a demonstrably false gospel that elevates fabrications and rejects reality.  The Earth is not 6,000 or 10,000 years old. The claim that it is cannot be defended. At all.  It’s not just a scientifically indefensible claim, it’s a morally indefensible claim. Young-earth creationism is simply immoral.  Not all sins are stupid and not all stupidity is sinful, but young-earth creationism is both.

What is anti-religion is promoting a demonstrably false gospel that elevates fabrications and rejects reality. The Earth is not 6,000 or 10,000 years old. The claim that it is cannot be defended. At all. It’s not just a scientifically indefensible claim, it’s a morally indefensible claim. Young-earth creationism is simply immoral. Not all sins are stupid and not all stupidity is sinful, but young-earth creationism is both.

speech 2
Young-earth creationism is no better than any other form of malicious gossip

Young-earth creationism is no better than any other form of malicious gossip

Pinterest • The world’s catalogue of ideas
Search